

One of the most significant disadvantages of globe valves is the high-pressure drop they cause. The fluid in a globe valve must change direction multiple times—typically entering, rising vertically through the seat, and then turning again to exit. This tortuous path causes turbulence and energy loss, making globe valves less efficient in systems where pressure conservation is essential.
Because of the internal design, globe valves generate more flow resistance compared to gate or ball valves. This feature makes them unsuitable for applications that require full bore flow or minimal obstruction.
Globe valves tend to be bulkier and heavier than other valves with the same pressure rating and bore size. Their design requires more material and space, which can be a disadvantage in compact systems or where weight is a consideration, such as in marine or offshore platforms.

Due to their complex internal structure and material use, globe valves are typically more expensive than simpler valve types like gate or butterfly valves. Maintenance costs can also be higher because of the multiple components involved.
Globe valves are not well-suited for applications involving viscous, slurry, or contaminated media. The tight tolerances between the plug and seat can cause clogging or wear when handling abrasive or dirty fluids.